Tag Archives: funny

“One of these two Mormons could be our next president…the other is Jon Huntsman.”

In the arena of both “funny” and “perhaps too true,” The Colbert Report had a segment on Mormons. Click on the picture below to watch it.

A few highlights to watch for:

Enhanced by Zemanta

Is this how they see Republicans? And how they see themselves?

I’m just sayin’…

Apparently, I need to misspel something.

Speaking of legalese that no one reads…

Yesterday, I happened to read the legal disclaimers and warnings on the bottom of an email exchange. It was the first time I had actually looked at them, and I wondered “aloud” if anyone reads them.

Nope, said an associate. We just put them in emails to cover us in case we screw up.

XKCD added some further light on such disclaimers, pointing out that even elevators carry disclaimers…that it is unlikely that anyone reads.

Meet a lawyer who practices Third Amendment law

Really? I doubt it. I’m about 89% sure that this is a joke….

A lawyer who practices Third Amendment law. That’s right. That’s the amendment about quartering soldiers in your home.

T “Scotch” Reynolds: Third Amendment Lawyer | Big Legal Brain.

BLB: Just what is the Third Amendment?

Scotch: I can quote it, if you want, it’s not that long. The Third Amendment provides that “No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.”

BLB: Sounds awful.

Scotch: Not really. It’s one of the more dynamic amendments, especially if you’ve studied it for some time, like I have.

BLB: But, how’s it apply? Give us some applications of the Third Amendment.

Scotch: Great question. Hypothetically, let’s say the military decides that its soldiers and armed personnel need to stay in your house, at no cost to the government. The Third Amendment prohibits that from happening, unless we are in a time of war.

BLB: Wow. All of them in my house?

Scotch: Hypothetically.

BLB: But aren’t we in a war? A War on Terror. I think we’re at level Orange. Scary.

Scotch: Sure. Putting four or five colonels in your house is currently not per seunconstitutional. The U.S. could quarter soldiers in your house but the soldiers have to act mannerly if they do.

Mannerly, eh? Excuse me while I look up the legal definition of “mannerly” in my copy of Black’s…

Catch the rest of this timely and “informative” interview at Big Legal Brain, a blog which “thinks for your practice so you don’t have to.”

We provide big-brained ideas for small-brained attorneys. We concentrate on optimizing the metrics for your practice so that you can take advantage of all cross-platform communication channels and keep your sights on each of your practice goals.

Yep. That’s what she said.