A Post Every Workday
May 2017 M T W T F S S « Oct 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Top TopicsArticle I, Section 8 Article V Book Reviews Books and Reading Business Abroad Characteristics of Lawyers Civil Rights Constitutional Law Criminal Law Democratic Politics drafting Education Reform Elections Entitlement Reform First Amendment Fiscal Reform Fourth Amendment funny funny case names Government healthcare reform History and People Immigration In Ius Voco Spurius International Interest Judicial Activism Law Practice Tips Law School Leaders Legal Profession Legal Research legal writing Litigation News Round Up Nothing to do with the law Political Thought Politics Privacy Questionable Laws and Lawmakers Republican Politics Restaurant Reviews SCOTUS Second Amendment Sixth Amendment Tech and IP The Common Law The Economy Trial by Jury Uncategorized Utah Legislature
Most mentioned tags:2012 Arizona Barack Obama Books California Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints congress constitution Democratic Economics Education Elena Kagan entitlement reform Facebook Federal government of the United States First Amendment Florida food Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints funny George W. Bush Google Government History human rights Humor immigration In Ius Voco Spurius it's the economy stupid James Madison Jim Matheson law law firm Law Practice Tips lawsuit lawyer legal writing Medicare Mitt Romney New York Times Obama Administration politics Polygamy postaday2011 President of the United States privacy Republican Republicans Restaurant Review Restaurant Reviews Restaurants I Like Restaurants I like less Salt Lake City Salt Lake City Eats Salt Lake Tribune Same-sex marriage Scalia SCOTUS Social Security Supreme Court Supreme Court of the United States Texas transparency twilight Twitter United States United States Congress United States Constitution United States Supreme Court Utah Utah State Legislature Wall Street Journal Warren Jeffs White House xkcd
Tag Archives: legal writing
On writing, from the Curmudgeon’s Guide to Practicing Law, page 25: “Edit yourself.”
Really. Do it. If you don’t, someone else will have to edit your work for you, and that’s, well, embarrassing.
Further, shorten your sentences.
After I write a brief, I go back and re-read it, concentrating solely on matters of style. I read each paragraph to see if it has a topic sentence. I read each sentence to be sure that it is no more than three and one-half typed lines long. (The average reader can keep the beginning of a sentence in mind for only three and one-half typed lines. If the sentence runs on for five or six lines, the reader will lose his thought and be forced to go back and re-read the beginning of the sentence. This is no way to persuade.)
What are you as a lawyer if not a persuader? So go back to that sentence or paragraph you loved, the one where you waxed eloquent for several pages, and cut it down. Find the passive voice, and replace the verb “to be.”
No one will complain for having to read less to get the same point.
“No one will ever complain about your writing making something easier to understand.”
That’s how you should try to write, whether its for a partner, a judge, or your client. Simple, clean, articulate, and careful. No one has to read what you write, and it doesn’t take much to distract the reader to something else. Keep their attention. Each sentence should draw the reader further into the story. Er, the brief.
Ever feel like the writer of the brief you just read (or worse, wrote) was purposely making things more difficult than they were? Calvin and Hobbes aside, Today’s practice tip comes from Tad Radford, former Guardian science editor, letters editor, arts editor and literary editor. He lays down the “25 Commandments,” ostensibly for journalists, but just as applicable for legal writers (or any writers, for that matter).
Some of my favorites:
5. Here is a thing to carve in pokerwork and hang over your typewriter. “No one will ever complain because you have made something too easy to understand.”
15. Words have meanings. Respect those meanings. Get radical and look them up in the dictionary, find out where they have been. Then use them properly. Don’t flaunt authority by flouting your ignorance. Don’t whatever you do go down a hard road to hoe, without asking yourself how you would hoe a road. Or for that matter, a roe.
For the legal writer, go order a copy of Black’s Law Dictionary and a Dictionary of Modern Legal Usage. They’ll strengthen your vocabulary and deepen your abilities, not to mention complement your writing.
19. Beware of long and preposterous words. Beware of jargon. If you are a science writer this is doubly important. If you are a science writer, you occasionally have to bandy words that no ordinary human ever uses, like phenotype, mitochondrion, cosmic inflation, Gaussian distribution and isostasy. So you really don’t want to be effulgent or felicitous as well. You could just try being bright and happy.
A close cousin to #19 is #20:
20. English is better than Latin. You don’t exterminate, you kill. You don’t salivate, you drool. You don’t conflagrate, you burn. Moses did not say to Pharaoh: “The consequence of non-release of one particular subject ethnic population could result ultimately in some kind of algal manifestation in the main river basin, with unforeseen outcomes for flora and fauna, not excluding consumer services.” He said “the waters which are in the river … shall be turned to blood, and the fish that is in the river shall die, and the river shall stink.”
If there is one thing I never grow tired of laughing at is lawyers’ over-use, or abuse, of Latin. Heck, or by non-lawyers with delusions of grandeur. It rarely strengthens an argument and it definitely doesn’t make you sound smarter.
That’s not to say there are not any times when it’s appropriate, but they are few and far between. The few times that it is actually useful are when the phrase has entered the English lexicon as a phrase commonly understood (or at least among lawyers). For example: the phrase ‘habeas corpus.’ It doesn’t actually help to say “you have to have the body” when we all know that it has a specific legal meaning, specifically bringing a prisoner before a court to ensure that their detention is not illegal. You just say “a habeas corpus petition” or a “writ of habeas corpus.” (Or Great Writ, if you really want to sound pretentious.)
So, check your Latin at the door and say what you mean–in English, the language we all speak. Don’t say ‘sub judice’ when you can just say “before the court.”
My favorite of Radford’s writing commandments is on expanding your abilities through reading:
22. Read. Read lots of different things. Read the King James Bible, and Dickens, and poems by Shelley, and Marvel Comics and thrillers by Chester Himes and Dashiell Hammett. Look at the astonishing things you can do with words. Note the way they can conjure up whole worlds in the space of half a page.
Amen. I especially like Dashiel Hammett. And no one plays a Dasheill Hammett character like Humphrey Bogart. Pick up a copy of “The Maltese Falcon” when you get a chance. “It’s the stuff dreams are made of.”
Find Radford’s full “manifesto for the simple scribe” here.
- A manifesto for the simple scribe – my 25 commandments for journalists (guardian.co.uk)
- The art of writing – and getting published – an interview with Harry Bingham (writeanything.wordpress.com)
- Inspiration From the Bench: 4 Content Marketing Lessons From a District Court Judge (mpdailyfix.com)
Whether you’re a newly minted lawyer or a third year associate, a solo practitioner or one of hundreds in a national firm, you should regularly review of the basics of practicing law. Research, writing, presentation, argument, and knowledge of the law are just tools of our trade, and keeping them sharp is as important to our practice as it is for any carpenter sharpening chisels, saws, and blades.
This month I am reading the short and handy “The Curmudgeon’s Guide to Practicing Law” by Mark Herrmann. With quick, practical, and to the point tips on everything from how to write a clear and concise brief to the etiquette of voice messages, it has proven, so far, to be both a delightful and refreshing reminder of the basics of legal practice, not to mention a good laugh.
- The Ten Most Common Mistaken Assumptions Made by New Lawyers (including #10: “So long as it’s clearly marked “DRAFT,” no one will care if it’s incomprehensible.”)
- What They Didn’t Teach You in Law School (I found this particularly interesting, and I might someday add some bits of it here)
- The Curmudgeon’s Law Dictionary (including this definition of Business Development: “Playing golf with old college buddies. As in: ‘Of course I charged the firm for my business development trip to Scotland.'” Or this one for Will Contest: “A judicial procedure in which disappointed legatees attempt to prove that their beloved testator was drunk, incompetent, or unduly influenced at the time the estate plan was made.”)
- The Curmudgeon on Clients, wherein the Curmudgeon reminds us that we are not in the legal industry, but the service industry, and it is our job to make clients’ lives easier.
- And so on…
Pick it up. Published by the ABA or available online at Amazon, it’s worth your read, both for the chuckles and the real, and very practical, advice for success as a lawyer.
- Return of the Curmudgeon (simplejustice.us)
- Inside Straight: Business Development (Part 2) (abovethelaw.com)
- International (And China) Litigation. The Questions To Ask. (chinalawblog.com)
“As a colleague of mine once put it, ‘I never met a man who didn’t think he was a great lover or a lawyer who didn’t think he was a great writer. Ninety-nine times out of a hundred, they’re deluded.’”